Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solomon Hykes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 22:12, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Solomon Hykes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

notability not established. no coverage outside industry media. Ysangkok (talk) 13:36, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:44, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:48, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:48, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:48, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:48, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – Below are some sources. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:56, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

Wired
Forbes (written by a Forbes staff writer)
Information Week, page2
Business Insider
eWeek
InfoWorld
Opensource.com
GeekWire
Gigaom
Business Insider
The Register
Business Insider

Delete. Just trivial commercial PR. Xxanthippe (talk) 08:00, 13 December 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:39, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Docker, Inc. or just delete. So far at least the person has no independent notability beyond the company, as far as I can tell. Too soon for a separate article. Not every kid who starts a company that survives a few years get his own. The company article is pretty bad too, just a bullet list that needs to be rewritten into prose. W Nowicki (talk) 19:10, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Docker there's nothing worth merging. DGG ( talk ) 21:49, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.